<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href='http://feeds.feedsky.com/styles/temp01.xsl' type='text/xsl' ?><!--这是一个由Feedsy提供技术支持的Feed，为了提高读者阅读的体验，以及满足用户美化自己Feed的需要，我们设计了多种精美的Feed模板，提供给大家选择，所有最终呈现出来的样式，皆由用户自愿选择使用，未经许可，任何团体和个人，请不要擅自修改样式或者盗用，这是对于用户选择权的尊重。--><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:fs="http://www.feedsky.com/namespace/feed" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><atom:link href="http://feeds.feedsky.com/csdn.net/papercrane" type="application/rss+xml" rel="self"></atom:link><fs:self_link href="http://feeds.feedsky.com/csdn.net/papercrane" type="application/rss+xml"></fs:self_link><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:41:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><title>papercrane的专栏</title><item><title>你为什么要做自动化测试</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/06/05/2513963.aspx</link><wfw:comment>comments/2513963.aspx</wfw:comment><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/2513963.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=2513963</trackback:ping><description>怎样做自动化测试听得多了，想了解为什么做，什么时候做吗？&lt;img src =&quot;aggbug/2513963.aspx&quot; width = &quot;1&quot; height = &quot;1&quot; /&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:41:00 +0800</pubDate><author>papercrane</author><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/06/05/2513963.aspx#Feedback</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/06/05/2513963.aspx</guid><dc:creator>papercrane</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/06/05/2513963.aspx</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/rss.aspx</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>csdn.net/papercrane/~1327840/206296572/1332452</fs:itemid></item><item><title>飞花摘叶还是重剑无锋</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/04/16/2296377.aspx</link><wfw:comment>comments/2296377.aspx</wfw:comment><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/2296377.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=2296377</trackback:ping><description>开发和测试工程师写出来的代码有高下之分吗？&lt;img src =&quot;aggbug/2296377.aspx&quot; width = &quot;1&quot; height = &quot;1&quot; /&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:26:00 +0800</pubDate><author>papercrane</author><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/04/16/2296377.aspx#Feedback</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/04/16/2296377.aspx</guid><dc:creator>papercrane</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/04/16/2296377.aspx</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/rss.aspx</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>csdn.net/papercrane/~1327840/206296573/1332452</fs:itemid></item><item><title>纯技术角度看自动化测试的迷思</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/17/1747560.aspx</link><wfw:comment>comments/1747560.aspx</wfw:comment><slash:comments>11</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1747560.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1747560</trackback:ping><description>纯粹从技术角度分析自动化测试中的不正确假设。&lt;img src =&quot;aggbug/1747560.aspx&quot; width = &quot;1&quot; height = &quot;1&quot; /&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:50:00 +0800</pubDate><author>papercrane</author><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/17/1747560.aspx#Feedback</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/17/1747560.aspx</guid><dc:creator>papercrane</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/17/1747560.aspx</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/rss.aspx</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>csdn.net/papercrane/~1327840/206296574/1332452</fs:itemid></item><item><title>物理实验与软件测试</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/12/1739527.aspx</link><wfw:comment>comments/1739527.aspx</wfw:comment><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1739527.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1739527</trackback:ping><description>物理实验和软件测试看似风牛马不相及，其实其纽带是对未知世界的探索&lt;img src =&quot;aggbug/1739527.aspx&quot; width = &quot;1&quot; height = &quot;1&quot; /&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 22:21:00 +0800</pubDate><author>papercrane</author><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/12/1739527.aspx#Feedback</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/12/1739527.aspx</guid><dc:creator>papercrane</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/12/1739527.aspx</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/rss.aspx</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>csdn.net/papercrane/~1327840/206296575/1332452</fs:itemid></item><item><title>来电闪光电话</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/05/14/1609200.aspx</link><wfw:comment>comments/1609200.aspx</wfw:comment><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1609200.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1609200</trackback:ping><description>“早知如此，何必当初”。不想项目落到这般田地？考虑计划和设计阶段的测试吧。&lt;img src =&quot;aggbug/1609200.aspx&quot; width = &quot;1&quot; height = &quot;1&quot; /&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 07:59:00 +0800</pubDate><author>papercrane</author><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/05/14/1609200.aspx#Feedback</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/05/14/1609200.aspx</guid><dc:creator>papercrane</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/05/14/1609200.aspx</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/rss.aspx</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>csdn.net/papercrane/~1327840/206296576/1332452</fs:itemid></item><item><title>行百里者半九十：浅谈发布测试</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/04/30/1592452.aspx</link><wfw:comment>comments/1592452.aspx</wfw:comment><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1592452.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1592452</trackback:ping><description>你知道哥德堡号是怎样沉没的吗？这跟发布测试有相同之处。&lt;img src =&quot;aggbug/1592452.aspx&quot; width = &quot;1&quot; height = &quot;1&quot; /&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:33:00 +0800</pubDate><author>papercrane</author><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/04/30/1592452.aspx#Feedback</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/04/30/1592452.aspx</guid><dc:creator>papercrane</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/04/30/1592452.aspx</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/rss.aspx</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>csdn.net/papercrane/~1327840/206296577/1332452</fs:itemid></item></channel></rss>